I just started drinking a little coffee again recently after about a two year hiatus. I decided to refresh my understanding of concerns that have been raised about the consumption of unfiltered coffee. I had been drinking French press and also enjoy espresso. If you research this subject on the open Internet, you will probably walk away thinking a small amount of espresso is OK but French press will probably kill you. So, I decided I wanted to have a more nuanced understanding and inquired with ChatGPT about this.
I’ve read that French press coffee can raise your cholesterol. However, was unclear to me if this claim was based upon randomized controlled research or at least observation of people drinking French press coffee compared to people who drank regular drip. Or was the research more speculative based on one or more of the active constituents in French press coffee that would normally be trapped by a paper filter having been shown in isolation in a laboratory to raise cholesterol.
ChatGPT said:
Your question is insightful and highlights an important distinction in nutrition research: epidemiological evidence vs. mechanistic (lab-based) speculation. Here’s a clear breakdown of what the science actually shows about French press coffee and cholesterol:
1. The Key Compounds: Diterpenes (Cafestol and Kahweol)
French press coffee (and other unfiltered methods like Turkish or Scandinavian boiled coffee) retains cafestol and kahweol, lipid-raising diterpenes found in coffee oil. Paper filters trap these compounds, so they’re largely absent in drip-brewed or filtered coffee.
Lab and mechanistic studies clearly show:
- Cafestol is one of the most potent dietary compounds for raising LDL cholesterol.
- It likely works by suppressing bile acid synthesis, which affects cholesterol metabolism.
2. Human Studies: RCTs and Observational Evidence
Yes, there is human research — including RCTs and observational studies — showing that unfiltered coffee raises cholesterol.
Key Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs):
- A 1994 RCT published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that consumption of boiled (unfiltered) coffee significantly increased serum cholesterol compared to filtered coffee.
- A meta-analysis in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001) concluded that consumption of unfiltered coffee increases total and LDL cholesterol — largely due to cafestol.
- French press coffee, though less studied than Scandinavian boiled coffee, is chemically similar in terms of diterpene content and thus presumed to have similar effects.
Example RCT Findings:
- Boiled coffee (6 cups/day) raised LDL cholesterol by ~10% in 4–8 weeks.
- Filtered coffee had no significant effect on LDL or total cholesterol.
3. Epidemiological Studies:
- Some large-scale observational studies also report that higher consumption of unfiltered coffee is associated with higher LDL and total cholesterol, supporting the RCT findings.
Summary Answer:
The claim that French press coffee can raise cholesterol is not just speculative. It is based on:
- Lab studies demonstrating the cholesterol-raising effects of cafestol and kahweol.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing that unfiltered coffee, which contains these compounds, raises LDL and total cholesterol.
- Epidemiological evidence aligning with these findings.
So while not every study used French press specifically, the mechanism and results from closely related brewing methods are robust enough to justify caution, especially for those with cholesterol concerns.
Would you like references to some of the key studies?
You said:
You mentioned an RCT from over 30 years ago and a met a-analysis from almost 25 years ago. I’m wondering if there’s been any more recent research and how well reproduced or replicated these studies are.
ChatGPT said:
Yes, more recent research has continued to explore the relationship between French press coffee and cholesterol levels, reinforcing earlier findings while also providing new insights.
Recent Research Findings
1. Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on French Press Coffee
A six-month RCT involving 46 healthy adults compared the effects of consuming French press (cafetière) coffee versus filtered coffee. Participants consuming 5–6 cups of French press coffee daily experienced significant increases in LDL cholesterol and liver enzymes compared to those drinking filtered coffee .PMC+1PubMed+1
2. Mechanistic Study on Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Activity
Another study found that French press coffee consumption led to a significant increase in CETP activity, a protein involved in lipid metabolism. This increase preceded the rise in LDL cholesterol, suggesting a potential mechanism by which unfiltered coffee raises cholesterol levels .PubMed
3. Workplace Coffee Machine Study
A recent study analyzed coffee from various workplace machines and found that coffee brewed without paper filters contained higher levels of cafestol and kahweol, compounds known to raise cholesterol. The study suggested that switching to paper-filtered coffee could reduce LDL cholesterol levels .People.com+1Health+1
Summary
Recent studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational research, have reinforced the link between unfiltered coffee methods—such as French press—and increased LDL cholesterol levels. The presence of diterpenes like cafestol and kahweol in unfiltered coffee appears to play a significant role in this effect.
If you’re concerned about cholesterol, opting for paper-filtered coffee methods may be advisable.
You said:
One of the studies you mentioned that specifically looked at French press coffee evaluated people who are drinking five or more cups per day. This makes me wonder if there’s a dose dependency effect.
ChatGPT said:
Yes, there is clear evidence of a dose-dependent relationship between unfiltered coffee (like French press) and increases in LDL cholesterol. This has been observed in both randomized controlled trials and mechanistic studies over the years.
Here’s what the research shows:
1. Dose-Response Relationship in RCTs
Several RCTs, particularly those studying boiled coffee (which has a similar diterpene content to French press), show that:
- Higher intake = Greater increases in cholesterol.
- The effect appears linear at lower doses, then plateaus or slows at very high intakes.
Example:
- 4–6 cups/day of unfiltered coffee raised LDL cholesterol by 8–12% in several trials.
- 1–2 cups/day had a modest or no significant effect, especially if consumed occasionally.
One study found:
- 10 mg of cafestol per day (roughly what’s found in 2–3 cups of French press) could raise LDL-C by ~0.13 mmol/L (~5 mg/dL).
- At higher intakes (30 mg/day cafestol or more), LDL-C increases by 0.4 mmol/L (~15 mg/dL).
2. Threshold Effect
Some studies suggest there’s a threshold level of cafestol intake below which effects on cholesterol are minimal. This threshold is estimated to be around 5–10 mg/day of cafestol — which is roughly:
- 1 cup of French press coffee (6–8 oz) = ~4–6 mg cafestol.
So occasional consumption of 1 cup/day may have minimal effect, while daily intake of multiple cups can lead to measurable cholesterol increases.
3. Inter-Individual Variability
Genetics, baseline cholesterol levels, liver enzyme activity (especially involving CYP450 enzymes), and diet can all modulate how sensitive a person is to the cholesterol-raising effects of cafestol.
Bottom Line:
- Yes, there’s a dose-response effect.
- 1 cup/day of French press may have negligible impact in many individuals.
- 3–5+ cups/day, especially consistently over weeks or months, are more likely to elevate LDL and total cholesterol, particularly in sensitive individuals.
If you’d like, I can calculate an estimated cafestol intake based on your usual brewing method and number of cups per day.
You said:
What about espresso, which is also unfiltered?
ChatGPT said:
Great follow-up — espresso is indeed unfiltered, but its impact on cholesterol is less than French press, due to differences in volume and preparation.
Here’s a detailed breakdown:
1. Cafestol & Kahweol Content in Espresso
Yes, espresso contains cafestol and kahweol, but much less per serving than French press:
| Brew Method | Cafestol per 150 mL (~5 oz) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| French Press | ~6–7 mg | Steeps for 4–5 minutes; high oil content |
| Boiled Coffee | ~7–10 mg | Highest levels |
| Espresso | ~1–2 mg (per shot, ~30 mL) | Lower volume, short contact time |
| Filtered (drip) | <0.2 mg | Paper filters remove most diterpenes |
- A single espresso shot (~30 mL) contains ~1 mg of cafestol.
- Two shots (~60 mL) = ~2 mg — still below the threshold where LDL is meaningfully affected for most people.
2. Dose Matters Again
Just like with French press, the amount of espresso consumed daily is key:
- 1–2 shots/day: Likely minimal or no impact on LDL in most people.
- 6–10 shots/day (common in some cultures): Could significantly raise LDL if sustained long-term.
A study published in Open Heart (2023) found that:
- People drinking 3–5 espresso shots daily had moderately higher LDL-C and total cholesterol compared to non-coffee drinkers.
- But the effect was less than in people who drank boiled or French press coffee.
3. Summary
- Espresso is unfiltered and contains cholesterol-raising diterpenes, but at lower doses per serving.
- Moderate consumption (1–2 shots/day) is unlikely to significantly impact cholesterol in most people.
- High consumption (5+ shots/day) could raise LDL, especially in sensitive individuals.
If you drink espresso regularly and are concerned about cholesterol, limiting intake to 1–2 servings/day or mixing in filtered coffee can help balance the risk. Let me know if you’d like a comparison chart or visual summary.
You said:
Are the components in unfiltered coffee that raise cholesterol above a certain threshold thought to have any beneficial effects when consumed in small amounts?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, the main cholesterol-raising compounds in unfiltered coffee — cafestol and kahweol — do appear to have some potential health benefits when consumed in small amounts, according to a range of cell, animal, and human studies. The key is dose and context.
Potential Health Benefits of Cafestol and Kahweol (at Low Doses)
1. Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects
- Both compounds activate Nrf2, a transcription factor that upregulates antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes.
- This may protect cells from oxidative stress and inflammation, especially in the liver and nervous system.
2. Liver-Protective Effects
- In animal models, cafestol and kahweol reduce markers of liver damage (ALT, AST).
- They may help prevent liver fibrosis and fatty liver disease by reducing oxidative and inflammatory signaling.
3. Anti-cancer Properties
- Lab studies show these compounds:
- Inhibit tumor cell proliferation
- Promote apoptosis in cancer cells (especially colon and prostate)
- Inhibit angiogenesis (blood vessel growth in tumors)
- These effects haven’t yet translated into robust human evidence but are promising.
4. Potential Anti-diabetic Effects
- Cafestol may enhance insulin secretion and improve glucose uptake in muscle cells in vitro.
- Some animal studies show improved blood glucose control with low-dose cafestol intake.
5. Neuroprotective Effects (Preliminary)
- In preclinical models, cafestol has been found to protect dopaminergic neurons, suggesting possible benefit in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s.
How Much Is “Low Dose”?
- Low doses = <5 mg/day cafestol, roughly equivalent to 1 espresso or 1 small cup of French press coffee.
- These levels may avoid significant LDL elevation while possibly offering modest health benefits.
Balancing Risks and Benefits
| Potential Benefit | Evidence Level | Likely Dose Range |
|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant/anti-inflammatory | Moderate (animal/human) | <5 mg/day |
| Liver protection | Good (animal) | <10 mg/day |
| Cholesterol elevation | Strong (human RCTs) | >10 mg/day |
| Anti-cancer (colon) | Emerging (lab/animal) | Unknown |
So yes — at low intake levels, these compounds may contribute positively to health, especially as part of a diverse, plant-rich diet. But they clearly raise cholesterol at higher intakes, and that’s where trade-offs start to appear, especially for people with cardiovascular risk.
Let me know if you’d like help estimating the cafestol content in your current coffee routine or comparing brew methods.
You said:
Doesn’t filtered coffee raise concerns about microplastic consumption?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, you’re right to ask — filtered coffee, especially when made using plastic-containing filters or single-use pods, has raised concerns about microplastic contamination. However, the level of concern depends heavily on the type of filter and brewing method used.
Here’s a breakdown of what’s known:
1. Paper Filters (Traditional Drip Coffee)
- No microplastics released.
- Paper filters (especially unbleached or FSC-certified) are biodegradable and inert.
- If you use a plastic brew basket, very little plastic comes into contact with hot water — so exposure is minimal.
Bottom line: Traditional paper-filtered drip coffee is not a major microplastic concern.
2. Single-Use Coffee Pods (e.g., Keurig, Nespresso)
- Yes, microplastics can be released, particularly when hot water contacts polypropylene, polyethylene, or polystyrene components.
- Some studies have found that brewing with plastic coffee pods can release thousands of microplastic particles per cup, depending on temperature and pressure.
- Aluminum capsules (like original Nespresso) reduce plastic exposure but may raise other concerns (e.g., aluminum leaching, environmental waste).
3. Reusable Plastic Filter Baskets
- Hot water in direct contact with plastic components may leach microplastics or plasticizers (e.g., BPA, phthalates), especially over time or at high temperatures.
- Newer machines often use BPA-free plastics, but BPA-free does not mean risk-free, as some substitutes (like BPS) may have endocrine-disrupting effects too.
4. Stainless Steel or Glass Filter Cones
- No microplastic risk.
- Pour-over systems using stainless steel mesh or glass (e.g., Chemex with paper filter) are chemically inert and ideal for minimizing synthetic exposure.
Summary: Microplastic Risk by Brewing Method
| Brewing Method | Microplastic Concern | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Paper-filtered drip | Low | Use unbleached paper + non-plastic brewer for best results |
| Plastic coffee pods | High | Hot water + plastic = microplastic and additive leaching |
| French press (glass/stainless) | Low | No microplastics, but contains cafestol/kahweol |
| Espresso (metal machine) | Very Low | High pressure, but usually metal chambers |
| Plastic filter basket | Moderate | Risk increases with age and heat cycles |
| Stainless or glass pour-over | None | Best option for purity |
Bottom Line:
- Filtered coffee isn’t inherently a microplastic concern if brewed with paper filters and non-plastic components.
- Single-use plastic pods are the main brewing method linked to significant microplastic exposure.
- If you’re aiming to minimize both cholesterol-raising compounds and microplastic exposure, consider:
- Paper filters
- Glass or stainless steel brewing equipment
- Avoiding plastic coffee pods and components in direct contact with hot water
Todd Luger's Blog 